 |
|
 |
A Case for Graphic Design
by Neil Tortorella
When my son was about 18 months to 2 years old, I remember driving
with him snuggly fitted into his back seat throne. He would point
and say, “McDono,” “K-Mart,” and the biggy,
“Toys ‘R Us” as we drove past the stores. Geez, the
kid’s a genius! He’s reading at barely two. I bet he’ll
finish Harvard by 10! Well, the fleeting thoughts of my grand contribution
to the gene pool were short lived. I knew better.
To me, this was one of the greatest implications of the power of
design. Here was this little guy, who could hardly walk and barely
talk, yet he could easily identify and associate corporate logos.
To him, these were not letters and words, they were simply shapes
and colors he’d seen time and time again through various media.
That, my friends, is case in point about the power of a consistently
delivered design program.
We’ve seen many ways companies compete, striving to stand out
from the growing crowd. The 1980s were about price, the 90s about
quality and technology. As these evolve into commodities, design
is becoming the new landscape where companies do battle for positioning,
mindshare and increased sales. Tom Peters, in an edition of @issue
said, “In a world loaded with stuff that looks like all the
other stuff and performs like all the other stuff, it [design] is
a way to stand out.”
The business world is beginning to discover design. When thoughtfully
researched, well executed and applied consistently, design translates
into increased brand equity and, ultimately, a healthier bottom
line. When applied systematically, it can produce economies of scale.
Although no one has developed a reliable way to put a solid dollar
value on graphic design, there is much good research going on. Product
design is a bit more clear. Take, for example, the Apple iMac. It’s
unconventional design and use of color (not even a hint of beige)
translated to sales of more than two million in it’s first
year and boosted Apple’s stock price from $15 to $70 per share
at the time. Not a bad showing.
In the area of print and web design, consistency is the key. A consumer
expects a product’s literature, packaging, web site, etc. to
work hand-in-hand. What is often perceived as quality is, in reality,
a matter of consistency. Everything a company puts before the public
should work together to reinforce the brand.
Think, for a moment, about your impression of a company whose literature
is shoddy and unprofessional. What are your feelings about them
and the quality of their product or service. Their sales rep may
give you a polished speech about the virtues of dealing with them
and the wonders of their product, but what goes on in the back of
your mind? What happens when their competitor comes in with a similar
product supported with professional literature that is well executed
and easy to understand. The rep also points you to their web site
which ties in seamlessly with the literature. Who do you feel more
comfortable dealing with? Do you feel they run a “tighter ship?”
What about the bottom line? Maybe the first company’s product
cost less. Does it run through you mind that maybe there’s
a reason? Are they using quality parts? Will they even be around
a few years from now when you need help?
For better or worse, we live in a world that is over communicated
and visually cluttered. A quickly and easily understood visual message
is often what separates an “okay” brand from a great one.
Design, in particular graphic design, can set the stage. A customer
will often see your logo before they have any dealings with your
company. A brochure or a visit to a web site will precede a visit
from a sales rep. What message are you sending out? Does your identity
jibe with the personality of your company? Or do your materials
display a slight case of multiple personality? Is the image portrayed
at one location the same as another?
The investment in quality graphic design simply makes good
business sense. Except for the smallest of projects, design fees
are usually a small portion of the overall project costs. Typically,
a small additional investment in the level of design quality can
produce a significantly higher ROI.
|
 |
|
